|
WORLD
POLICY JOURNAL
| ARTICLE:
Volume XIX, No 4, Winter 2002/03 |
Print
|
 |
|
|
Friendly
|
Lost in
Purgatory The Plight of Displaced Persons in the Caucasus
Kenneth H. Bacon and Maureen Lynch*
All people
forcibly uprooted by political violence are losers, but some are
bigger losers than others. We refer to a growing category of refugees
known in the chill jargon of humanitarian relief as "IDPs,"
or internally displaced persons. These are people driven from their
homes and farms within their own homeland, unlike those forced to
flee their country under threat of persecution. The difference is
critical, since under the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention
and its 1967 protocol, those qualifying as refugees receive greater
recognition, rights, assistance, and protection than the internally
displaced, even though both groups face similar hardships.
Moreover, there
is a political as well as a legal catch. IDPs are frequently pawns
in a slow-moving, inconclusive diplomatic chess game. Not only do
adversaries in civil conflicts tend to prefer protracted deadlock
to necessary compromise, but combatants often exploit displaced
populations as visual reminders of victimization, even at the cost
of prolonging their hardship. "Politics is keeping them victims
to attract donors," we were informed by a relief worker in
Azerbaijan, where many displaced communities rely on international
aid.
Nowhere are
the anomalies of this new purgatory more evident than in the South
Caucasus, the rugged isthmus that separates the Black and Caspian
Seas. Nearly 1.4 million people have been displaced by civil conflict
in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, amounting to 8.7 percent of
the population of the three countries. Most were displaced by ethnically
based independence movements shortly after the dissolution of the
Soviet Union—in the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over
Nagorno-Karabakh, and by Abkhazia’s attempt to break away from Georgia.
1 Many IDPs have lived in squalor for upward of a decade,
their plight either forgotten or known only to interested parties,
notwithstanding the new media attention on the Caucasus as a seedbed
of terrorism and instability. Our purpose is to describe the problem,
and to put forward some reasonable proposals for salvaging the people
trapped in this purgatory.
Uprooted Populations
The dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh, the contested ethnic Armenian
enclave within Azerbaijan, is the biggest longstanding source of
displacement in the South Caucasus. This conflict, embroiling Azerbaijan
and Armenia, has uprooted 844,000 Azeris, more than a tenth of Azerbaijan’s
population. In addition, large numbers of ethnic Armenians have
fled Azerbaijan, and today nearly 265,000 continue to live in refugee-like
conditions in Armenia. The dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh began shortly
after the Soviet Union incorporated the Caucasus in 1920–21. Moscow
placed the Armenian enclave under the governance of Azerbaijan.
In 1988, Armenians began to demonstrate against Azeri control. Demonstrations
turned into riots. Russian troops supported Baku’s efforts to retain
control of the en clave until 1991, when the population of Nagorno-Karabakh,
which was 75 percent Armenian, approved a referendum calling for
independence. Some 30,000 people died in the fighting that began
after the Russians withdrew, and hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijani
refugees fled the region. A 1994 cease-fire ended the fighting but
not the dispute. Efforts by outside mediators (Russia, France, and
the United States) have failed to yield even the rudiments of a
settlement. A displaced Azeri expressed a widely held sentiment:
"Our situation does not attract attention because we wait for
a peaceful solution and do not engage in violent acts. It just doesn’t
seem right." It is a view echoed by Brenda Shaffer of the Caspian
Studies Program at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Because
Nagorno-Karabakh is no longer the focus of a "hot" war
and displaced Azeris have not turned to terrorism to highlight their
plight, she says, the conflict has simply slipped off the screen,
its victims forgotten. 2
Their plight
is real, and the sore festers. Although the Azerbaijani government
has built some acceptable housing for displaced persons, most have
remained for years in substandard hovels with irregular access to
water and fuel. They live in abandoned box-cars, holes dug in the
ground, half-derelict Soviet-era apartment complexes, and make-shift
shanties. Old railway cars shelter the displaced persons we visited
near Imishli and Saatli in south central Azerbaijan. An elderly
woman explained that during the freezing winters she and other residents
use animal dung stored beneath the cars or deadwood from a nearby
forest for fuel. They bake their bread over open fires between the
parallel lines of boxcars; lack of access to water rules out truck
gardening.
In the urban
environs of Sumqayit, a large former Soviet industrial center on
the Caspian Sea, the displaced eke out an existence in an industrial
cemetery of smoke stacks, abandoned factories, and above-ground
gas pipes. At one dark, dank flat we visited, 72 families shared
one shower and a few "kitchens" (a single gas burner,
shallow plastic wash basins, and an occasional faucet). "Ninety
percent of the families here are unemployed," a resident said.
During the Soviet era, the factories made Railway car shelter, Imishli,
Azerbaijan. Photograph by Thatcher Cook.steel, synthetic rubber,
fertilizer, and petro-chemicals, "but the factories are all
closed down now." A widow with five children to support said:
"We first lived on the street, and then we found this room.
The state gives us 2,500 manats (about fifty cents) a month to support
ourselves, so we live on borrowed money and food until we can get
our land back."
Cruelly, though
their hardship has waxed, international support for these displaced
people has waned. Since 1993, the number of nongovernmental organizations
assisting refugees in Azerbaijan dropped to 62 from 180, illustrating
the sad reality that the longer a humanitarian crisis persists,
the harder it is to sustain interest and support. A further reason
for the decline in relief agencies working in Azerbaijan is the
sharp drop in funding there by the United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees; the UNHCR budget plunged from $12 million in 1999
to $3.9 million in 2001.
In Georgia,
though the numbers are smaller, the IDP crisis is as acute and even
more complex since no less than three conflicts have convulsed this
poor country of 5 million inhabitants. To the north lie Chechnya
and Dagestan, both within the Russian Federation; the former has
suffered two catastrophic wars within the past decade. Several thousand
Chechen refugees live within Georgia, in the Pankisi Gorge, where
fighting and lawlessness impede the delivery of most basic humanitarian
aid. Russian attacks on real or alleged Chechen terrorists have
resulted in repeated suspensions of relief programs.
In addition,
Georgia has experienced two secessionist conflicts of its own, which
have displaced about 5 percent of its population. South Ossetia
began a campaign in 1990 to form a political alliance with North
Ossetia, leading to an unsuccessful plebiscite in 1992 on the question
of seceding from Georgia and uniting with Russia. The conflict displaced
more than 60,000 people, most of whom fled to Russia; some 12,000
remain displaced within Georgia. Georgia’s northwest province of
Abkhazia also rebelled in 1991, displacing an estimated 250,000
Georgians, who had been the dominant ethnic group in the province,
making the ethnic Abkhazi a minority in their own region. In 1994,
Georgian and Abkhazi negotiators agreed to a separation of forces,
which is monitored by peacekeepers from former Soviet states and
a U.N. military observer mission. Several years ago, displaced Georgians
began to return home, but renewed fighting drove most of them out
again. Georgian officials claim that Russia sometimes sends troops
into Abkhazia to protect Abkhazi fighters. Episodic fighting isolates
those locked within Abkhazia. Everybody has lost. In a May 2001
report, Georgia: Paradise Lost, the International Committee
of the Red Cross warned that "the specter of a major public
health catastrophe looms, as water and sewage systems are nearing
breakdown, especially in urban areas."
A recent visit
to an abandoned hotel in Georgia’s central city of Kutaisi illustrates
the problems. We found Zuhra, an 18-year-old boy with lifeless eyes,
sitting listlessly in the dilapidated and windowless room he shares
with his 12-year-old brother. When Zuhra was eight, and his brother
two, they were forced to flee as orphans from wartorn Abkhazia.
At the ramshackle hotel, all they possess is a small bed, a space
heater, and each other’s support. They cook on a neighbor’s stove,
and use a bathroom shared by half the building’s 500 residents.
Zuhra finds occasional work as a day laborer but other-wise is a
casualty of a shattered country.
A Way to Bring
Peace
The problems in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia are depressingly
similar. Cease-fires have for the most part stopped the fighting,
but have failed to bring peace. Yet the governments in Baku and
Tblisi, hoping for settlements that will make their territories
whole again and allow their citizens to return home, are reluctant
to resettle IDPs in permanent homes. Thus, the displaced remain
in limbo. Lack of security prevents them from going home; indecision
prevents them from resettling.
More than anything,
peace is the fundamental precondition for ending the agonies of
displacement in Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The current efforts
to resolve the disputes surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia,
and South Ossetia focus on settling ethnic claims and trying to
find structures of governance that balance demands for independence
with commitments to territorial integrity. It might help to place
the negotiations in a broader regional context in order to spur
investment and economic growth, which could become a stabilizing
force.
The European
Union has helped create the Transportation Corridor Europe Caucasus
Asia (TRACECA), which is working to improve transportation between
Europe and Central Asia by harmonizing trade and tariff regulations.
At the Baku Conference, held in 1998, 12 countries, including Armenia,
Azerbaijan, and Georgia, signed an agreement that committed them
to cooperate on traffic security, cargo safety, and environmental
protection. Like the European Union, which started out by focusing
on economic and trade issues, TRACECA, could eventually provide
a foundation for improving cooperation in security, governance,
and human rights.
The planned
expansion of NATO along the Black Sea through the addition of Bulgaria
and Romania, the increasing importance of the Caspian Basin’s oil
wealth, the growing U.S. commitment to fighting terrorism in the
Caucasus, and Russia’s new concern about terrorists argue for a
cooperative effort to bring peace, stability, and prosperity to
the Caucasus.
The Rights
of the Forgotten
It is also time to eliminate the discrepancy in the way countries
and international organizations treat refugees and internally displaced
persons in the Caucasus and elsewhere. The number of IDPs worldwide
greatly exceeds the global refugee population: there are 22 million
internally displaced people, compared to 15 million refugees. Many
of the IDPs are in wartorn or repressively governed areas that are
difficult for the international community to reach—approximately
4 million in Sudan, 2.5 million in Colombia, 2 million in the Democratic
Republic of Congo, up to 1 million in Burma, and perhaps as many
in Iraq.
In 1998, Francis
M. Deng, the representative of the U.N. secretary general on internally
displaced persons, released a report detailing the protections internally
displaced people should receive. The Guiding Principles on Internal
Displacement were the result of several years’ work by a team of
international legal experts. 3 They seek to confer on
internally displaced people the same protections afforded under
the 1951 Refugee Convention. These include the right to be protected
against forcible return to unsafe areas, the right to food, shelter,
and clothing, the right to seek employment, and the right to seek
the protection of the courts. "The Principles clarify the rights
of the internally displaced and the obligation of other actors toward
these populations, and they bring together into one document the
disparate provisions of international humanitarian law, human rights
law and refugee law that by analogy apply to displaced populations,"
explains Roberta Cohen of the Brookings Institution.
Armenia, Azerbaijan,
and Georgia have embraced the goals of the Guiding Principles, but
their efforts in this direction have been hampered by lack of funds
and by their unwillingness to provide attractive resettlement opportunities.
In 1999, for example, the Azeri government passed a law guaranteeing
"social protection of forcibly displaced persons" by granting
them free access to health care, schooling, and social services,
but the promised services have not yet been provided. Armenia passed
a law in 2000 designed to help Armenians who fled Azerbaijan secure
housing, social services, and compensation for property they left
behind; however, Yerevan and Baku must first reach an agreement
on compensation for abandoned property. With international help,
Tbilisi has established the Georgia Self-Reliance Fund to help integrate
displaced persons into other parts of the country, but, according
to the U.S. Committee for Refugees, the program lacks adequate funding.
Ending displacement
and its human costs goes hand in hand with achieving peace and restoring
economic growth. The problems in the Caucasus, as in most ethnic
conflicts, are longstanding and complex, which is all the more reason
to approach them in a regional context with the goal of improving
economic growth, governance, and human rights.
It is a sobering
thought that the problems in the Caucasus would pale in comparison
to the displacement issues that could arise in Iraq after the departure
of Saddam Hussein, whether by peaceful or other means. In Iraq,
a Sunni minority has brutally suppressed a Shiite majority and a
Kurdish minority, displacing as many as a million people. War would
displace many more. Addressing the needs of Iraq’s displaced would
be a huge challenge. •
*Kenneth
H. Bacon is the president and Maureen Lynch is the research director
of Refugees International, a Washington-based advocacy organization.
Notes
1. All estimates
of the size of displaced populations in this article are from the
U.S. Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2002, available
at www.refugees.org.
2. Brenda Shaffer,
"East of the Oder: One Conflict That Can Be Solved," Wall
Street Journal Europe, July 26, 2002.
3. Although
the United Nations has embraced and issued copies of this document,
it has not adopted it, and the principles are not binding. The full
text is available at www.unicef.org/emerg/Guiding-Principles.htm.
[Go
to interactive
discussion forum]
You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader installed
on your computer to access full text PDF article.
 back
|