| CODA:
Volume XXII, No 1, Spring 2005 |
Print
|
 |
|
|
Friendly
|
WORLD
POLICY JOURNAL
The Black Book of Religion
In 1997, a thick grim volume titled The Black Book of Communism
became a surprise bestseller in France, where Marxism was once as
commonplace as claret. Edited by Stéphane Courtois, the director
of research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
in Paris, it documented the crimes against humanity committed across
the globe in the name of socialism. Expertly translated for American
readers by Harvard University Press in 2001, the Black Book offers
an authoritative indictment, 856 pages long, of the ideological
extremism to which many among the thinking classes have been susceptible.
The book writes finis to the state of denial on the left concerning
Stalin and Mao that long persisted, not just in France.
Faced as we are every day by a different kind of zealotry,
it occurred to me that we need a companion volume, a Black Book
of Religion, documenting the grievous offenses perpetrated in the
name of God. The suicide bombers who have sown mayhem in Iraq, the
Islamists who last year shredded railway passengers in Spain, or
the demented Muslim who recently shot and stabbed a Dutch filmmaker,
then pinned a note to his bleeding body boasting of his deed, are
but current examples of an uncomfortable paradox. Few humans stoop
lower, seemingly, than those whose gaze is fixed on heaven. The
same transcendent epiphany that animates saints can perversely transform
others into devils. Just how and why Dr. Jekyll becomes Mr. Hyde
surely deserves keener attention from the devout of all faiths,
or so it seems to me.
What follows is a prospectus, humbly submitted by
a troubled secularist.
The Slaying of Peacemakers
Topping my outline is the shaming fact that the bravest martyrs
to peace in our own time have been murdered by their own unforgiving
flock. Thus Mohandas Gandhi was fatally assailed by a Hindu, Anwar
Sadat by Muslim soldiers, and Yitzhak Rabin by a demented Jew. So,
too, with independent Sri Lanka's founding prime minister, Solomon
Bandaranaike, slain by a Buddhist monk in 1959 for seeking to conciliate
the island's estranged, non-Buddhist Tamil minority. When Michael
Collins agreed in 1922 to the peace treaty with Britain partitioning
Ireland, this generous-minded guerrilla chieftain confided to a
colleague that he had signed his death warrant; the sentence was
soon executed in Dublin by nationalist gunmen. In each case, decades
of strife intensified after these sacrificial murders. Typically,
awkward facts were ignored or denied within the stricken communities.
Writing in Moses and Monotheism, Sigmund Freud provocatively
speculated that Moses may have been secretly killed by the very
Israelites whom he had led, thus explaining the Bible's silence
concerning his fate.
But then, assassination from its origins has
been entwined with religion. The word itself derives from hash-shashun,
meaning hashish, the narcotic allegedly employed by an Islamic order
to drug potential assassins in Persia and Syria. Astutely, according
to accounts left by Marco Polo and by eleventh-century Crusaders,
the order's grand masters arranged for drugged youths to be awakened
in a castle where sultry damsels explained they were in paradise,
to which they would immediately return once they had carried out
the order's planned murder. The lure of heaven has been an abiding
motive for selfimmolation.
In The Blood of Martyrs (New York: Routledge, 2004), the University
of Wisconsin historian Joyce Salisbury details the blood offerings
among early Christians, initially encouraged by the church and popular
among the faithful. "The blood of martyrs is the seed of Christianity,"
opined the second-century church father, Tertullian. Over time,
dismayed by the brutal voyeurism attending immolation, later church
fathers condemned suicidebut not before the propaganda value
of martyrdom was established. There is thus a direct line from the
early Christian pyres to Jim Jones's People's Temple in Guyana and
David Karesh's deluded Davidians in Waco, Texas. The suicide bombers
in the Middle East are scarcely unique to Islam; indeed, as Salisbury
relates, the Prophet himself reputedly and more wisely admonished,
"The scholar's ink is more sacred than the blood of martyrs."
The Messiah's Red Badge
Asked to specify the bloodiest carnage during the nineteenth century,
most of us, I suspect, would propose either the Napoleonic wars
or America's Civil War. In fact, more casualties flowed from the
Taiping uprising that ravaged China in 184564, leaving at
least 20 million dead. The rising originated in the excited discovery
by a farmer named Hong Xiuguan that he was the younger brother of
Jesus Christ, and ordained by God to combat the demons leading the
earth astray. As he resolved in 1837, "My hand grasps the killing
power/in Heaven and earth;/to behead the evils ones, spare the just/and
ease the people's sorrow." Thus he established his own millennial
utopia, so frightening the creaking Qin Dynasty that a protracted
and sanguinary war ensued. The nightmares about China's instability,
its vulnerability to Western missionaries and British-imported Indian
opium, acquired galloping force as hundreds of thousands flocked
to Hong's cause. His doctrines were as baffling to Christians as
they were alarming to Confucians. Like other apocalyptic warriorsnotably,
the Mahdi, General Gordon's nemesis during the 1880s in Sudan
Hong became a legend. His story is powerfully retold by the Yale
historian Jonathan Spence in God's Chinese Son (New York: Norton,
1996).
Death and devastation tend to accompany the rise of messianic figures
because the Awaited Ones by definition wage their battles for souls,
not spoils or territory. Experience amply attests that ordinary
mortals will often fight heroically for what they perceive as a
glorious cause greater than themselves. Thus religious risings find
their secular mirror in wars fought for flag or radical doctrines,
with their attendant martyrs, saints, scriptures, holy days, and
cabalistic symbols rifled from the arsenals of faith. Not coincidentally,
Stalin was a lapsed priest, the Nazis seized on symbolism from medieval
crusades, and Mussolini, like the pope, thundered his words from
a balcony.
The Swords of Faith
We live in a world carved by warriors inflamed by either Cross or
Crescent. The frontiers between East and West, between Islam and
Christianity, and between the Orthodox and Latin faiths, were all
demarcated centuries ago through holy wars. We commonly forget how
many, and how bloody, these wars were. We may remember that there
were eight Crusades centering on the Holy Land between A.D. 1096
and 1270, and some may recollect less edifying detoursthe
sack of Christian Constantinople by the Venetians, the massacre
of Jews in the Rhineland, the savaging of the heretic Bogomils in
the Balkans, and of the Albigensians in France. But who recalls
the Northern Crusades?
The Northern Crusades raged sequentially around the Baltic and northern
Europe, from
A.D. 1147 to 1525, where the principal defenders of the True Faith
were the implacable and ferocious Order of Teutonic Knights. In
Germany, the Knights were subsequently seen as harbingers of the
Prussian monarchy and German Kultur, and of Bismarck's Second Reich
and Hitler's Third. "What thrills us," trumpeted the nineteenth-century
German writer Heinrich von Treitschke, "is the profound doctrine
of the supreme value of the State, which the Teutonic Knights perhaps
proclaimed more loudly and clearly than do any other voices speaking
to us from the German past." All but carried away, he added,
"A spell rises from the ground which was drenched with the
noblest German blood." So it came to pass that Heinrich Himmler
envisaged his elite SS units as the reincarnation of the Teutonic
Order. (For a fuller account, see The Northern Crusades by the Oxford
historian Eric Christiansen, [London: Penguin Books, 1997].)
Yet it also needs recalling that the Crusades found their counterpart
in the Islamic Jihad that persisted for more than 1,300 years, and
its glowering legatees now constitute America's prime adversary
in the war on terror. "From the fury of the Mohammedan, spare
us O Lord!" was a prayer that sounded for centuries in European
churches. Among the Jihad battlefields were Spain, Portugal, France,
Italy, Sicily, Austria, Bosnia, Serbia, Croatia,
Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Georgia, Poland, Ukraine, and
southern and eastern
Russia. "History has largely bypassed the Muslim attacks on
and invasions of Europe that lasted from the seventh to the seventeenth
century," writes Paul Fregosi, with some warrant, in Jihad
(Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997). "When accusing the West
of imperialism, Muslims are obsessed with the Christian Crusades,
but have forgotten their own, much grander Jihad." From the
windowed House of God, no one can credibly throw stones.
The Subjugation of Women
All the world's major religions, it can be safely generalized, are
patriarchal. In times past, and still in times present, leading
faiths offer divine sanction for the enthronement of the male over
his submissive mate. This primacy took extreme forms among Hindus,
who for centuries obliged high-caste widows to join the funeral
pyre along with their deceased lords in the now-forbidden rite known
as suttee; even today, some adherents condone wife burnings, if
and when dowries evaporate. Devout Muslim husbands can still confine
multiple spouses to purdah, while swaddling their bodies in obligatory
scarves and burkhas. Under traditional Islamic codes, allegedly
unfaithful wives can be stoned to death, and women who are deemed
dishonored can be slain with impunity. Still, nothing in the non-Christian
world matches the inherent misogyny of the Christian West's obsession
with witches.
Curiously, it was not during the Dark or Middle Ages,
but during the Renaissance and Reformation that the obsession with
witches raged through Europe, beginning with Pope Innocent VII's
notorious papal bull in 1484. During the next three centuries, as
many as several hundred thousand persons were tried and executed
as witches. The exact totals are elusive, since witch hunters tended
to exaggerate and key records are missing. But in the cautious reckoning
of the University of Texas historian Brian P. Levack, in early modern
Europe there were at least 110,000 witchcraft persecutions and 60,000
executions. And this hysteria was abetted by Protestants and humanists
who otherwise condemned the excesses of the Inquisition. As the
Oxford historian H. R. Trevor-Roper remarks in The European Witch-Craze
(New York: Harpers/Torchbooks, 1969):
Whatever allowance we may make for the mere
multiplication of evidence after the discovery of printing, there
can be no doubt that the witch-craze grew, and grew terribly, after
the Renaissance. Credulity in high places increased, its engines
of expression were made more terrible, more victims were sacrificed
to it. The years 15501600 were worse than the years 15001550,
and the years 16001650 were worse still. Nor was the craze
entirely separable from the intellectual and spiritual life of those
years. It was forwarded by cultivated popes of the Renaissance,
by the great Protestant Reformers, by the saints of the Counter-Reformation,
by the scholars, lawyers, and churchmen of the age of Scaliger and
Lipsius, Bacon and Grotius, Berulle and Pascal.
Thus the flames that lapped at Saint Joan in France found their
way across the Atlantic where Puritan divines in our own brave new
world proved more zealous than their homebound British counterparts
in trying, torturing, and executing women. As the infidel Mark Twain
once rightly observed, humans are the only animals that blush, or
have reason to.
Ignorance Is Strength
It is not just people but reason itself that has historically provoked
an embarrassing intolerance among believers of every kind. Rabbis
and priests, monks and mullahs, often look with suspicion on scientific
discoveries or contentions that appear somehow to conflict with
their doctrines. A great American named Andrew White completed a
landmark two volume book on this theme titled A History of the Warfare
of Science and Theology in Christendom.
He corrected the proofs in 1896 while living in St. Petersburg,
where he was serving as U.S. envoy to the tsars. White was as well
a historian and eminent educator, having helped found and establish
the intellectual traditions of Cornell University. With compendious
detail, he documented efforts by theologians to suppress, refute,
or traduce scientific scholarship in a score of fields, from astronomy
to zoology. Nothing so sharpened his pen as the assaults on Charles
Darwin.
White noted that Origin of the Species (1859) burst into the theological
world "like a plough into an anthill." As the decades
progressed, and as battle lines hardened, he writes, everything
was done "to discredit Darwin, to pour contempt upon him, and
even, of all things in the world, to make himthe gentlest
of mankind'a persecutor of Christianity,' while his followers
were represented more and more as charlatans or dupes." Thanks
to White and scholars like him, America and its academies were made
safer for Darwinism. Indeed, so widespread was derision in the 1920s
when a teacher named Scopes was tried in Tennessee for violating
state anti-evolution laws that it appeared that the battle was won. It
proved premature. In this age of computers and space travel, Christian
evangelists and ultra-orthodox Jews are more than ever troubled
by Darwinism. Sharing their alarm is a new school of Islamic creationists,
exemplified by Harun Yaha, who writes in The Evolution
Deceit that the six-day creation story in the Koran is literally
true and the theory of evolution "nothing but a deception imposed
on us by the dominators of the world system."Even more specifically,
Srila Prabhupada of the Hare Krishna movement explains that God
created "the 8,400,000 species of life from the very beginning"
to establish rigorous tiers of reincarnation. Such beliefs are more
than a fringe or cult phenomenon. A Gallup poll in February 2001
found that 45 percent of Americans responding agreed that "God
created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time
within the last 10,000 years or so." The political battle over
adding creationism to schoolbooks is so widespread that National
Geographic, that pillar of every medical waiting room, blazoned
its cover with this question in November 2004: "Was Darwin
Wrong?" (An emphatic NO, responded the Geographic, providing
a full-court, richly illustrated exposition of natural selection,
together with the data quoted just above.)
Unreason is contagious. Inevitably, as night follows day, evangelicals
discerned an omen in Asia's devastating tsunami: that the Almighty
was punishing Swedish homosexuals vacationing in Thailand. How curious
that a republic founded by eighteenth-century rationalistswho
avoided all mention of God in the Constitutionshould today
spawn legislatures bent on breaching the once inviolable wall separating
church and state. From revising schoolbooks to implanting the Ten
Commandments in courthouse squares, politicians now fish in the
seas of belief, abetted by a president who seems persuaded that
a special Providence guides his hand. High time, surely, for the
party of reason to recall the follies and crimes perpetrated through
the centuries by God's self-chosen apostles. Karl E. Meyer
[Go
to interactive
discussion forum]
You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader installed
on your computer to access WPJ's full
text PDF articles.
back
|