| ARMS
TRADE RESOURCE CENTER
CURRENT UPDATES:
February 1, 2006
Dear Friends,
The Arms Trade Resource Center offers these responses to President
Bush's State of the Union. Bill Hartung is working on an op-ed version
of his response on missile defense, which we hope to post here soon
and a longer version of Frida Berrigan's NO END IN SIGHT: Bush on
Iraq is
posted on CommonDreams at
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0201-37.htm
All the best,
Bill Hartung
Frida Berrigan
-----------------------------
MISSILE DEFENSE:
THE HIDDEN COSTS
William D. Hartung,
Senior Research Fellow, World Policy Institute;
Tel. 212-229-5808, ext. 4257; e-mail hartung@newschool.edu
"The president
finally spoke about the multi-billion dollar U.S. missile defense
program last night. But it was President Vladimir Putin of Russia,
reporting on a new warhead designed to penetrate the U.S. system.
By contrast,
President Bush was silent about the Pentagon's most expensive weapons
program in last night's State of the Union Address. The president's
reticence is understandable. Spending on missile defense projects
has doubled during the Bush presidency, from $4.2 billion in 2000
to $8.8 billion now, with precious little to show for
it. The last three tests of the ground-based element of the system
have failed miserably. In two tests the interceptor missile couldn't
even get out of its silo.
Even if it could
be made to work - a dubious proposition -- missile defense has no
relevance to fighting terrorism. The billions lavished on missile
defense could be much better spent on protecting U.S. ports and
chemical plants, or on increased investments in locking down loose
nuclear weapons and nuclear bomb-making materials in Russia and
beyond."
For more on
this topic, see "Tangled Web 2005: A Profile of the Missile
Defense and Space Weapons Lobbies," at http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/tangledweb.html.
NO END IN
SIGHT: Bush on Iraq
Frida Berrigan
, Research Associate, World Policy Institute; Tel. 212-229-5808,
ext. 4254; e-mail berrigaf@newschool.edu
Nothing highlights
the chasm between the rosy picture that President George W. Bush
tried to paint in the State of the Union last night and the sober
reality of ongoing war in Iraq like these two quotes:
"2,245
Dead. How many more?"
"My fellow
citizens, we are in this fight to win, and we are winning."
Gold Star mother
Cindy Sheehan, an invited guest at the State of the Union, was arrested
for wearing a t-shirt that asked "2,245 Dead. How many more?"
about deaths of U.S. soldiers in Iraq. President Bush never saw
her or her t-shirt; she was out of the building before he ever
ascended the podium. Last night, President Bush offered nothing
new that would answer Sheehan's question, or the heart-broken questions
of so many other bereaved family members who have lost sons and
daughters in the war.
In light of
recent news headlines like: "Stop-Loss Used to Retain 50,000
US Troops," "Report: Army Near Breaking Point," "Nearly
Half of Iraqis Support Attacks on U.S. troops," and "Most
Iraqis Doubt U.S. Will Ever Leave," the President's shopworn
phrases about a "clear plan for victory" and "progress
on the ground" in Iraq sounded tattered and tired.
At the end
of the day, it is not empty rhetoric that matters, its how these
policies, promises, and platitudes impact the United States and
the world. In his speech, President Bush recommitted to endless
war, and we have to do more than nod our heads in response.
Reports
  |  Recent News Coverage  
|  Updates
|